Four Ball Wear Test

This test show just how well synthetics Protects Against Wear

The Four-Ball Wear Test evaluates the protection provided by engine oil under conditions of pressure and sliding motion. The size of the scar left as a result of the test determines the amount of wear protection the lubricant provides. The smaller the wear scar, the better the protection. Tests show that AMSOIL 10W-30 Synthetic Motor Oil has better antiwear performance than all other oils tested. With AMSOIL Synthetic Motor Oil, engine life can be extended and major repairs are often reduced.

 

 

 

 

Notice the Royal Purple pace of 7th

 

  • yhs-att_001
  • four ball wear test
  • oil wear test
  • 4 ball wear test
  • motor oil wear test
  • royal purple four ball wear test
  • four ball test best lubricant oil
  • four ball wear test results
  • grease four ball wear
  • oil 4 ball test
  • grease with the best four-ball wear
  • best oil for wear
  • commecial oil four ball test results
  • amsoil 4 ball wear test
  • conventional motor oil tests
  • 4 ball wear test number
  • motor oil wear test result
  • 4 ball wear test results

2 Comments

  1. Where is the test results for Royal Purple? You claim to outperform Royal Purple, please send me the comparison.
    Regards,
    Troy Murphy
    NHRA Drag Racing Competitor

  2. Sure we can heres one
    Four-Ball Wear Test
    and I will post more later
    However a good read about Royal Purple and false claims

    BP Lubricants Challenges Royal Purple’s Claims for Synthetic Motor Oil
    NAD® Recommends Royal Purple Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims

    New York, NY – April 1, 2009 – The National Advertising Division (NAD®) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has recommended that Royal Purple, Ltd., modify or discontinue certain advertising claims for it’s synthetic motor oil.

    NAD, the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, examined comparative performance and superiority claims in print, broadcast and Internet advertising, following a challenge by BP Lubricants.

    Claims at issue included:

    “Independent university and industry tests document the performance gains of using Royal Purple. When compared to leading synthetic and conventional motor oils, Royal Purple typically:”
    “Increases horsepower and torque by as much as 3%.”
    “Reduces engine wear by as much as 80%.”
    “Improves fuel economy by as much as 5%.”
    “Fuel economy improvement up to 5% or more.”
    “Reduces engine heat by as much as 10%.”
    “Reductions in heat of up to 12%.”
    “Reduces engine heat by as much as 10%.”
    “Reduces emissions up to 20% or more.”
    “Reductions in emissions of 20% or more.”
    “Unsurpassed”, “Unparalleled”, “Most Advanced…”
    “Provides Film Strength up to 400% stronger than other motor oils…”
    “Superior oxidation stability…”
    “API/ILSAC Certified.”

    In its decision, NAD noted that the advertiser voluntarily agreed to discontinue the claims “most advanced,” “unsurpassed performance” and “unparalleled performance,” steps that NAD found were necessary and proper to avoid confusion in the marketplace NAD noted that it appreciated the advertiser’s participation in the NAD process, especially as a newcomer to the retail automotive industry as it branches out from industrial lubricants. Further, NAD noted that testimonials included in a wide range of auto-enthusiast publications indicate that Royal Purple’s consumers are “vocally appreciative of its synthetic purple engine oil.”

    More here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>